At the Wellthisiswhatithink desk, deep in darkest Melbourne, people occasionally pass us vital documents they think should be broadcast to a wider audience.
This is how we stumbled across this revelatory but top secret intelligence briefing on the situation in Syria and Iraq.
With luck, this highly restricted document will clear up any confusion you have on the situation over there. We publish so that the truth may be known. Eat your heart out, Wikileaks.
So … (deep breath) …
YOUR EYES ONLY
Let’s kick off with Syria. President Assad (who is bad) is a nasty guy with a bad moustache who only got the job because his Dad had it before, but then he got so nasty that his people rebelled and the Rebels (who are good) started winning. (Hurrah!) This is despite the dorky Assad having a rather dishy British wife who was universally believed to be good, until she spent too much on shoes and stuff and became generally considered to be bad.
Things were sort of going OK for the good rebels but then some of them turned more than a bit nasty and are now called IS or ISIL or Islamic State or Daesh (doesn’t matter what they’re called, they are definitely bad) and some rebels continued to support democracy (who are still good) and some we are just not all that sure about (who may be bad, or good, but time will tell).
IS are so bad even Al Qaeda (really bad too) don’t like them and start fighting them.
The Americans (who are good) start bombing Islamic State (who are bad) and giving arms to the Syrian Rebels (who are good) so they could fight Assad (who is still bad), which was good. But this ironically puts America on the same side as Al Qaeda in Syria, which is just plain odd.
Now. There is a breakaway state in the north run by the Kurds who want to fight IS (which is a good thing) but the Turkish authorities think they are bad, so we have to say they are bad whilst secretly thinking they’re good and giving them guns to fight IS (which is good) but that is another matter altogether and we’ll get more confused so we’ll let it go. Meanwhile the Turks have shot down a Russian plane which they say was flying in their airspace (which is definitely bad).
Anyway, getting back to Syria and Iraq.
So President Putin (who is bad, because he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks including that nice Russian man in London with polonium-poisoned sushi) has decided to back Assad (who is still bad) by attacking ISIS (who are also bad) which is sort of a good thing?
But Putin (still bad) thinks the Syrian Rebels (who are good) are also bad, and so he bombs them too, much to the annoyance of the Americans (who are good) who are busy backing and arming the rebels (who are also good).
Now Iran (who used to be bad, but now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel with them are now sort-of good) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad (still bad) as are the Russians (bad) who now have both ground troops and aircraft in Syria.
So a new Coalition of Assad (still bad) Putin (extra bad) and the Iranians (good, but in a bad sort of way) are going to attack IS (who are very bad) which is a good thing, but also the Syrian Rebels (who are good), which is bad.
Annoyingly, now the British (obviously good, except that funny and rather confused Mr Corbyn, who is probably bad in an ineffective sort of way) and the Americans (also good) and the Australians (who are generally considered good because they’re mainly about cold beer and beaches) cannot attack Assad (still bad) for fear of upsetting Putin (bad) and Iran (good/bad) so now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS (who are super bad).
So Assad (bad) is now probably good, being better than IS (but let’s face it, drinking your own wee is better than IS, so no real choice there) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them good.
America (still good) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin (now good) and that nice mad Ayatollah in Iran (sort of good) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and then on to Europe (which is bad) or join IS (still the only constantly bad group, and that would be really bad).
For all the Sunni Muslims in the area, an attack by Shia Muslims and Alawites (Iran and Assad) backed by Russians (infidels) will be seen as something of a Holy War, and the ranks of Daesh will now be seen by the Sunnis as the only Jihadis fighting in the Holy War. Hence many Muslims will now see IS as good even though they are the baddest of the bad. (Doh!)
Sunni Muslims will also see the lack of action by Britain and America in support of their (good) Sunni rebel brothers as something of a betrayal (not to mention we didn’t do anything about a corrupt Shia government being imposed on Sunnis when we took over Iraq: hmmm, might have a point there) and hence we will be seen as more Bad. Again.
A few million refugees are now out of harm’s way (good) but nobody really wants them (bad) and now winter’s coming (bad). Lots of people think the refugees are how IS will sneak bad guys into Europe (which would be bad, but there’s no evidence of it happening, which is good, but that doesn’t stop people being frightened of them even though they have no reason to be, which is bad). Meanwhile the French have decided to bomb Iraq to pay back IS for the attacks (bad) in Paris and other countries like Lebanon and Jordan also look like getting dragged further and further into the conflict (bad).
So now we have America (now bad) and Britain (also bad) and Australia (bad, but with good beer), providing limited support to Sunni Rebels (bad) many of whom are looking to IS (good/bad depending on your point of view, even though they’re still really bad) for support against Assad (now good) who, along with Iran (also good) and Putin (also, now, unbelievably, good) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started?
There. I hope that this clears it all up for you.
And if in doubt, fuck it, let’s all just bomb someone else. ‘Cause that will help.
Very nice. Hey, why don’t we just blame the Black Guy? It’s all his fault anyway.
LikeLike
I’ll get around to that.
LikeLike
Brilliant summation of the situation..
PM
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Peter. Sometimes satire is the easiest way ….
LikeLike
Blame the Black Guy? It’s all his fault? Dick Cheney is black?
LikeLike
Come on,. everything is Obama’s fault, you know that.
LikeLike
Oi you lot of cold beer swilling surfer dudes …. Corbyn is not a confused little man …. he is the only honest, morally grounded ‘good man’ in British Politics. There should be more men like him heading governments worldwide …. if there were we would not be in the fecking mess we are all in now …. thanks to all these egotistical dick-heads that are currently ‘in control’ ….. (just my opinion…of course).
LikeLike
And your opinion is, of course, very welcome.
LikeLike
America invaded Austalia ( which is good, because they now have somewhere to dump all their nuclear waste ) Australia doesn’t mind ( which is good, because there are more clients to drink Fosters lager which is bad because it tastes like piss which the Aussies admit.
LikeLike
Er … right.
LikeLike
[…] nice, and fair to each other” is questionable at the best of times. And becomes truly silly when applied to […]
LikeLike
Hmm, this analyst has got things mostly right. Sadly the analyst appears to have glossed over Saudi, Qatar and Bahrain, (and so on) who are our allies (good?) but funding terrorists and other malcontents. As for Australian beer being good, I presume this was a deliberate mistake put in to see if people are still reading at the end? Even NZ beer is better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
New Zealand makes beer? Who knew?
LikeLike
Hmm, they’ve heard about how Australian beer is like having sex on a beach (both f***ing close to water) and so instead put in more hops than you’ll find in a kangaroo sanctuary. Burns your throat after a long session.
LikeLike