justin trudeau


While the scale of the Liberal victory in Canada is as yet unknown, the fact of the win itself makes history, making this “only the second time in Canada’s history that a party has gone from third place in Parliament to first,” as noted by the BBC’s Anthony Zurcher.

The official election gives Liberals a commanding majority of Parliaments 338 seats. Currently it looks like this:

  • Liberals: 127 elected, leading in 186 ridings, 41.5% of the vote
  • Conservatives: 72 elected, leading in 108 ridings, 31.8% of the vote
  • NDP: 14 elected, leading in 33 ridings, 18.4% of the vote
  • Bloc Quebecois: three elected, leading in 10 ridings, 4.6% of the vote

Born while his father Pierre was prime minister, Canada’s new leader Justin Trudeau has taken a circuitous route to power

Just a few months ago, Justin Trudeau was an unlikely contender to be Canada’s next prime minister. Running third in the polls, behind incumbent Stephen Harper’s Conservatives and the resurgent left wing New Democratic party, Trudeau – son of legendary prime minister Pierre Trudeau – was slated as too young (he is 43) and too inexperienced to haul his beleaguered Liberal party out of the electoral mess of the 2011 general election.

That result saw the Liberal party – once the dominant force in Canadian politics – slump to third place for the first time in its history, its worst ever showing with just 34 seats. At that point, Trudeau brushed off expectations that he would succeed outgoing Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff, saying: “Because of the history packaged into my name, a lot of people are turning to me in a way that … to be blunt, concerns me.”

His family – he has three young children aged eight and under with his wife Sophie Grégoire – was also cited as a reason not to put himself forward. But by 2012, with other contenders falling by the wayside, the spotlight swung once again to Trudeau, and in October of that year he launched his bid with a rally in Montreal.

His victory in April 2013 was almost embarrassingly comprehensive: he took over the Liberal party with 80.1% of the vote. The national polls – initially, at least – surged in his favour.

But the path to government proved rather rockier. Progressive voters were tempted by Thomas Mulcair’s New Democrats, while Harper’s unpopular Conservative government took heart from the surprise victory – attributed to “shy Tories” – of David Cameron’s party in the UK elections in May.

Trudeau’s appeal to the centre ground risked losing out to both its neighbours.

So what changed? Harper’s tactics, referring to his challenger condescendingly as “Justin” and campaign ads that poked fun at his “nice hair”, found no grip among a section of the electorate that wanted the Conservatives out at all costs because they were simply tired of them, and increasingly saw Trudeau as the best chance of achieving that. Conservative mean-mindedness also saw the Conservatives look out of touch on the world refugee crisis in major urban areas where there were large numbers of recent immigrants.

The long election campaign – the longest, in fact, since 1872, at 78 days – gave the Liberals the time to build on that boost. Trudeau told the Guardian in July that he relished it: “If there’s one thing that recent history in Canada has shown it’s that campaigns really matter. And there’s a tremendous volatility among voters who are just looking for the right alternative.”

Trudeau, for all his dynastic connections that he himself appeared to mistrust, aimed to be that alternative. Almost literally born to the role of prime minister – he was born in 1975, during his father’s second term – he took a circuitous route into political life, trying his hand at teaching, engineering, bungee-jumping coaching, environmental geography, charity boxing and acting, before ousting Bloc Québécois MP Vivian Barbot to become MP for Papineau in the 2008 general election.


Like Jack Kennedy before him, Pierre Trudeau was as famous for his glamorous and headline-grabbing wife Margaret as he was for his own wit and wisdom.

In 2000, at his father’s state funeral, Trudeau delivered a eulogy that stoked whispers of a dynasty that has, indeed, now secured its place in Canadian history: “More than anything, to me, he was dad. And what a dad. He loved us with the passion and the devotion that encompassed his life. He taught us to believe in ourselves, to stand up for ourselves, to know ourselves and to accept responsibility for ourselves.

We knew we were the luckiest kids in the world. And we had done nothing to actually deserve it. It was instead something that we would have to spend the rest of our lives to work very hard to live up to.”

And now, in terms of winning an election, at least, the son has indeed lived up to his illustrious father.

Meanwhile defeated Prime Minister Steven Harper will be treated kindly by history, having proved a stable hand on the tiller for a long period, and having “saved the deck chairs on the Titanic” with a creditable result even in defeat. Clearly there weren’t as many “shy Tories” in Canada as in the UK last May. Long-term incumbency has once again been shown to be a mixed blessing for Governments seeking re-election, especially when the same leadership is presenting itself for re-endorsement. The Conservative Party in the UK, currently riding high in the polls, would do well to pay attention. The result will also buoy those Small-l and Big-l liberals in the UK and Europe who have seen their brand of radical centrism fall out of favour recently.

Clearly the one defining factor in all Western democratic politics is now “volatility”, for good or bad.

Further reading: Five things that will be different in a Trudeau government

(Guardian and our own commentary)

  1. underwriiter505 says:

    I am so happy for Canada, and I wish the Canadian people all the continuation of hope and all of the political stamina they will need to clean up the mess that Harper and his harlots, rather like American frat boys, have left behind for others to make right.


    • Certainly a stunning turnaround in the Liberals’ fortunes. I just hope expectations are not therefore unreasonably high …


      • underwriiter505 says:

        Agreed. And we have been there and done that. At least, due to the system used, Canada cannot get stuck with a Prime Minister of one mind and a parliament with large majorities of the opposite mind, which has hurt us badly.


What do YOU think? That's what matters. Please comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s