Donald Trump: the man who will finally kill off the Republican Party, or just a very naughty boy?

Posted: July 22, 2015 in Political musings
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The excellent article below – from the NY correspondent of the BBC – discusses the fascinating phenomenon that is Donald Trump, politician, businessman, and possessor of the most bizarre and oft-photographed hairpiece of all time.

For those of us wondering how this buffoon can suddenly look like the most popular candidate to lead the GOP into the next presidential election, it is chock full of good reportage and explanation.

We do not believe for a moment that donald-trump-bad-hairTrump will survive increasing scrutiny as the race progresses. We are still in the “silly season”. But he may, as this article points out, achieve something more lasting – the trashing of the Republican brand before the general election has even started. Because achieving knee-jerk popularity with the more fervent of the GOP’s right wing is not the task at hand. The GOP needs a candidate that can build a winning coalition in the whole country, and in America today, that means with the Hispanic vote. Calling Mexican immigrants criminals and “rapists” seems an odd way to do that.

Interestingly, the British Labour Party is currently mesmerised by a similar character on the other side of the political spectrum, the dyed-in-the-wool left-winger Jeremy Corbyn – a late entrant into their Leadership campaign – who unlike Trump increasingly looks as if he can win it. The right in the UK can hardly believe their luck – Labour would look marginalised and irrelevant to the mass of Britons in no time flat.

For the same reason, Democrats in America are hugging themselves with glee at Trump’s performance. He doesn’t have to win the nomination to deliver the White House to them on a plate for the third election running, he just has to make the Republican Party look un-electably bizarre. And unlike the UK, where any “Corbyn effect” could be dissipated by 2020 (especially if he didn’t survive all five years as leader) Trump has the money and the bull-headishness to keep campaigning till well into the Northern hemisphere autumn and beyond. The damage he does will still be causing the Republican brand to reek a year later.

No wonder party managers in democracies wince when someone suggests the membership should select their leader, and increasingly common phenomenon.

Those who are motivated enough to join a political party or register as a supporter are often the very worst people to judge who has both the gravitas and the broad credentials to win a general election.

Donald Trump: Master of the demolition derby

Donald Trump

And lately it has come to resemble a gruesome episode of Big Brother, where it becomes near impossible to evict a boorish and abusive housemate because of his popularity with viewers.

Trump, evidently, is more than a guilty pleasure, the political equivalent of a late-night fix of tabloid TV for those returning, drunkenly, from a long night in the pub or bar. Judging by his poll numbers, a significant proportion of sober-minded voters who will next year select the Republican nominee like both him and his take-no-prisoners message, even though to many it sounds deranged and racist.

The latest poll, conducted by ABC News and the Washington Post, shows him with a commanding lead: 24% of registered Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, compared with 13% for the Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and 12% for the former Florida Governor, Jeb Bush. Labelling Mexican immigrants criminals and “rapists”, as Trump did in June when he announced his bid for the presidency, sounded like the demagogic rant of a fringe extremist.

To question the military record of Senator John McCain, a former prisoner of war tortured so brutally that he is unable still to raise his arms above his shoulders, would ordinarily have been suicidal. But Trump is operating under rules of his own making that are perfectly suited to the voracious metabolism of the modern media, and the hyperventilated style of modern campaigning. The more outrageous his remarks, the more coverage and social media comment he generates. And the more coverage he receives, the better his polling numbers seemingly become (though most of the polling in the latest survey was conducted before the McCain controversy). Increasingly, notoriety equals popularity amongst a large cohort of Republican voters.


Senator John McCain

Trump questioned Senator McCain’s war record


This was an equation that the Texas Senator Ted Cruz hoped to turn to his advantage, until he was trumped by Trump. Though easy to lampoon as cartoonish and crazed, the billionaire tycoon has come to personify the dilemma faced by the modern-day GOP. From the late-1960s to the late-1980s, when it won five out of six elections, the party dominated presidential politics largely by appealing to disgruntled whites unsettled by the pace of racial and social change – a constituency that includes many who agree with Trump’s hard-line stance on immigration. Nowadays, however, party leaders recognise that, after losing the popular vote in five of the last six presidential contests, the GOP needs to broaden its demographic appeal. It cannot rely on what was known as “the southern strategy”.


Jeb Bush and Scott Walker

Jeb Bush and Scott Walker are currently trailing Trump in the polls


Reaching out to Latino voters, who Ronald Reagan once memorably described as Republicans who didn’t yet realise it, has become an urgent priority. After all, in 2012 Mitt Romney secured just 27% of the Latino vote, proof of what Senator Lindsey Graham has called the party’s “demographic death spiral”. The GOP’s electoral conundrum has been finding ways of courting new voters without alienating longstanding supporters. Trump, who obviously runs the risk of erecting a wall between the GOP and Hispanic voters akin to the impregnable barrier that he wants to construct along the Mexican border, is single-handedly demolishing that strategy. Not only that. His early success suggests that the broad church strategy might be politically unfeasible.

Messenger or message?

If a quarter of Republican voters truly are embracing Trump – many presumably because of his nativistic rants rather than in spite of them – the outreach programme is in serious trouble. The party’s establishment will hope that voters are warming to the messenger rather than the message, but the two are increasingly entwined. Moreover, voters devouring the red meat being thrown them on a daily basis by Trump will surely look upon inclusive Republicans like Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio as kale-eating vegans. Now a major problem, a month ago Trump presented an opportunity writ large in the kind of large gold letters affixed to his hotels and office buildings.


Mitt Romney waits to address a campaign rally at Pinkerton Academy in Derry in January 2012

Mitt Romney notably failed to secure the Latino vote


Had the other candidates taken him down immediately after his “rapist” comments, they could have helped transform the Republican brand. Instead, figures like Jeb Bush hesitated. It took the former Florida governor, who is married to a Mexican, two weeks to come up with a strong rebuttal, calling Trump’s remarks “extraordinarily ugly”. Corporate America reacted more swiftly, with companies like NBC Universal quickly severing their ties with Trump, even though they know he is a ratings winner. There is an argument to be made that Trump helps the candidacies of Bush and Walker, the other front-runners, if only because he is eclipsing rivals, like Rubio, who pose a more realistic threat. But that line of reasoning surely underestimates the damage that he is doing, long-term, to the Republican brand. Here, the hope will be that Trump is seen as such an outlier, and such an outsider, that he does more damage to his personal standing than the party’s reputation.

Early impressions key

But early impressions are hard to shake, as Mitt Romney discovered in 2012 when the Democrats successfully cast him as an economic elitist long before he could define himself. Latino voters will surely remember the party’s rather feeble response to Trump after the media caravan has moved on. In the Twitter age, media cycles are so momentary that Trump could well turn out to be summer silly season special, much like Michele Bachman who unexpectedly won the Iowa straw poll in the summer of 2011. Certainly, party leaders will be hoping he follows the boom/bust cycle that was the hallmark of the 2012 race. Remember the Herman Cain surge or the Gingrich spike? But Trump is a seasoned pro, with more staying power and more money. His business empire has been built on his extraordinary gift for self-publicity – he is a human headline – and an ability to make improbable comebacks.


Nelson Rockefeller

Richard Nixon struck a deal with Nelson Rockefeller to secure liberal Republican support


Back in 1960, when Vice President Richard Nixon sought to tie up the Republican nomination, he ended up making a pact with the then New York Governor, Nelson Rockefeller, to secure the support of liberal Republicans. Because the two men met in Rockefeller’s luxury Manhattan apartment, it was dubbed the Treaty of Fifth Avenue. Arguably, the Republican Party needs a new Treaty of Fifth Avenue, the home of the famed Trump Tower, this time aimed at disembowelling “The Donald.”

Next month, he looks certain to appear on stage in the first televised debate of the campaign, qualifying as one of the ten most popular candidates.

That, surely, will be car crash television, and Trump has already proved himself the master of the demolition derby.

  1. underwriiter505 says:

    You and the correspondent you quote seem to be forgetting that Donald Trump is not the only insult comic in the Republican lineup. In fact, the Republican party has been systematically alienating many voting blocs for years. Then why are they winning elections, you ask? Or if you don’t, I will ask for you.

    It’s a great question. In fact, if you take the 2014 Congressional and Senatorial elections, take all the votes for Democrats and all the votes for Republicans and throw them in one big national pot without regard to state or district, Democrats received a substantial percentage more votes than Republicans. Yet Republicans took the House 246 to 188, and achieved a majority in the Senate. But not content with throttling the majority of voters by voting districts, the Republicans are also doing their level best to disenfranchise anyone who might possibly vote Democratic. Do I think the Republican Party can survive Donald Trump? Frankly, I think the Republican Party could survive the Wicked Witch of the West. Oh, wait, they already have.

    But all I can do is what I can. I will do that, and I will enjoy the photos of the Trump Caterpillar, technically the flannel moth caterpillar, while observing that it even behaves rather like The Donald.

    Liked by 1 person

    • You are always a wonderfully reliable source of great content – thank you!

      One problem the Democrats have is piling up votes in seats where they don’t need them. Both parties need to extend their reach into what is sometimes ill-advisedly called “the centre ground”.

      In fact, the Republicans didn’t do THAT well in the recent mid-terms, if one analyses the races carefully, and it could be argued that without a gerrymander even more obvious and egregious than those equally enthusiastically employed by some Democrat states, they’d be doing worse. I suspect they have no chance whatsoever of taking the White House in 2016, but we’re still a long way from Kansas, Toto. As for the other nut jobs on the GOP list, some are simply astounding objects of ridicule. In fact, it’s hard to find one that offers the gravitas to even give the Democrats a run for their money. It is astounding how this once great party has been hijacked by the extreme right, and resultantly, marginalised.


      • underwriiter505 says:

        Yes, as Pat A suggests, they are objects of ridicule to you, to her, and to me. But they are not objects of ridicule in their home districts. They keep getting reelected, sometimes even when under indictment. Boehner had a very hard time getting Grimm to resign as he was taken off to prison. His district loves him. The sentence is not that long. He’ll be out in 2016 and probably run and win again.


  2. Pat A says:

    The trouble is that if one studies American politics – Trump’s extreme views are what they all say in private (and try and put into practice behind the scenes). God help us all.


  3. Pat A says:

    As well as the gerrymandering of districts (which the Repugs started to put into place by infiltrating School Boards and working upwards some years ago) – I forgot till I read underwriter505’s post about the benighted computerised voting in some states – in the Presidential Elections a friend of mine kept voting for Obama and her vote was constantly changed to Romney. By some mysterious co-incidence the voting machines were all apparently supplied by Romney’s son. Many people videoed these odd occurrences on their smart phones at the time and several hit the media, so it wasn’t just in her case. Strange that such a thing could happen in machines supplied by the candidate’s son, isn’t it?!


    • And yet not a murmur of scandal. And incidentally, this scenario (crooked voting machines) forms the back story of the rather overblown but nevertheless enjoyable American political soap opera, called Scandal. Maybe it’s masquerading as entertainment and is really exposure?


What do YOU think? That's what matters. Please comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s