"You have sat there too long for any good you may do. For God's sake, go!"

“You have sat there too long for any good you may do. For God’s sake, go!”

The following comments were posted on Facebook by Peter Chegwyn, not only one of the most astute men I know, but also one of the Liberal Party’s (and then the Liberal Democrats’) most highly credentialled campaign organisers and managers.

So… a lost deposit in Manchester Wythenshawe, vote down from 22.3% to under 5%, BNP & Greens beaten by just 400 votes, Lib. Dem. vote just 1/3 of the Tory vote and 1/4 of the UKIP vote, all this in a seat where we polled better than the national average in both 2005 & 2010 and, in normal circumstances, could have expected to finish a respectable 2nd this time.

No doubt we’ll hear the usual from the leadership… ‘This is a seat we were never going to win’ (true), ‘We wouldn’t expect to poll well here’ (untrue), ‘We’ll do better in seats we hold’ etc. etc. etc.

How long before people wake up and smell the coffee?

Will it take a hammering in the European & local elections in May or even then will people still stick their heads in the sand as 2015 fast approaches?

Note, the Lib Dems lost their deposit having previously held more than a fifth of the vote in the seat. Their vote collapsed by more than 17%. Repeat that result across all the LD’s current seats. Go on, I dare you.

I endorse entirely what Peter says, and I extrapolate it to its logical conclusion.

Whether we like it or not, politics in the modern media era is increasingly “presidential” in style.

The Lib Dems leader, Nick Clegg, is now electoral poison. He is way past his use by date. If the LD’s persist with him, they will be slaughtered at not only the upcoming local Council and European elections (losing some very fine people in the process through no fault of theirs, which does no one any good, specifically the good people they represent) but at the next General Election they will be reduced to an irrelevant rump of seats – back to the dark days of the 1950s-1970s.

And his credibility is not going to be helped by breaking stories like this.

Anyhow, apparently, a request by 75 constituency parties for a leadership spill can trigger an election. Moves are afoot amongst seasoned party campaigners to test that possibility.

But it would be much better, faster and cleaner if those who believe in the future of the party – we are not entirely convinced Clegg does, which is why he may be less concerned than many others – were to “tap him on the shoulder”. “Come on chum, nice try.  Sword on the table in the ante-room. There’s a good fellow. Fall on it.”

Your correspondent, Dear Reader, is clear.

Clegg. Must. Go. Now.

Period.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. paul says:

    Wow, you’ve smelt the coffee

    Like

  2. manzo says:

    To be honest, I think that would just be rearranging the deckchairs, I don’t think that there is anything that the Lib Dems can do to regain the trust of all those left-leaning voters they hoodwinked last time around. It’ll certainly be a cold day in hell before they get my vote again.

    Like

    • Well you might be right, Manzo, but I am not prepared to see a great political tradition die for want of trying.

      Like

      • John Broggio says:

        Which great political tradition would that be? Robbing votes from the electorate on false pretences by pretending to be left of the then current government? Clegg fits well with Blair (minus the dodgy war, of course)…

        Like

        • Liberalism has been responsible for some of the greatest advances in the civilized world – in Britain, National Insurance and the National Health Service were both Liberal ideas. The role of liberalism as a civilizing force is not uniquely down to the a Liberal Party nor the Lib Dems, but it is a genuine, unique philosophical thread, and it is worth defending.

          Like

          • manzo says:

            I agree that it’s worth defending, I don’t think that Clegg is entitled to claim that he’s a defender of it, his massive volte face when power was dangled in front of him saw to that. So, technically, I suppose that I’d agree with your initial proposition of replacing him. I’d still argue that it’s too late to make any difference, you can only play the “Vote for us, we’re not like the other lying politicians” card once in a generation.

            Like

What do YOU think? That's what matters. Please comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s